ThespiritandthelanguageoftheFiresideConversationwererooteddeepinMarkTwain’snatureandinhislife,asC。E。S。Wood,whoprinted1601atWestPoint,haspertinentlyobserved,\"IfImadeaguessastotheintellectualfermentoutofwhich1601roseIwouldsaythatMark’sintellectualstructureandsubconsciousgrainingwasfromAnglo—SaxonsasprimitiveasthecommonmanoftheTudorperiod。

    HecamefromthebanksoftheMississippi——fromtheflatboatmen,pilots,roustabouts,farmersandvillagefolkofarude,primitivepeople——asLincolndid。

    \"HewasfinishedintheminingcampsoftheWestamongstagedrivers,gamblersandthemenof’49。Thesimpleroughnessofafrontierpeoplewasinhisbloodandbrain。

    \"Wordsvulgarandoffensivetootherearswereacommonlanguagetohim。

    AnyonewhoeverknewMarkheardhimusethemfreely,forcibly,picturesquelyinhisunrestrainedconversation。Suchlanguageisforcibleasallprimitivewordsare。Refinementseemstomakeforweakness——orletussayacuttingedge——buttheoldvulgarmonosyllabicwordsbitliketheblowofapioneer’sax——andMarkwaslikethat。ThenIthink1601cameoutofMark’sinstinctivehumor,satireandhatredofpuritanism。Butthereismorethanthis;withallitshumorthereisasenseofrealdelightinwhatmaybecalledobscenityforitsownsake。

    WhitmanandtheBiblearenomoreobscenethanNatureherself——nomoreobscenethanamanurepile,outofwhichcomerosesandcherries。Everywordusedin1601wasusedbyourownrudepioneersasapartoftheirvocabulary——andnowordwaseverinventedbymanwithobsceneintent,butonlyaslanguagetoexpresshismeaning。Noactofnatureisobsceneinitself——butwhensuchwordsandactsaredraggedinforanulteriorpurposetheybecomeoffensive,aseverythingoutofplaceisoffensive。

    Ithinkhedelighted,too,inshocking——givingresoundingslapsonwhatChaucerwouldquitesimplycall’thebareerse。’\"

    QuiteasidefromthisChaucerian\"erse\"slapping,Clemenshadalsoasemi—seriouspurpose,thatofreproducingapasttimeashesawitinShakespeare,Dekker,Jonson,andotherwritersoftheElizabethanera。

    FiresideConversationwasanexerciseinscholarshipilluminedbyakeensenseofcharacter。Itwasmadeespeciallyeffectivebytheartisticarrangementofwidely—gatheredmaterialintoacompressedpictureofaphaseofthemannersandeventhemindsofthemenandwomen\"inthespacioustimesofgreatElizabeth。\"

    MarkTwainmadeof1601averysmartandfascinatingperformance,carriedoveralmosttogrotesquenessjusttoshowitwasnotdoneformeredelightinthefranknaturalismofthefunctionswithwhichitdeals。

    ThatMarkTwainhadmadeconsiderablestudyofthisfranknessisapparentfromchapterfourof’AYankeeAtKingArthur’sCourt,’wherehereferstotheconversationatthefamousRoundTablethus:

    \"Manyofthetermsusedinthemostmatter—of—factwaybythisgreatassemblageofthefirstladiesandgentlemenofthelandwouldhavemadeaComancheblush。Indelicacyistoomildatermtoconveytheidea。

    However,IhadreadTomJonesandRoderickRandomandotherbooksofthatkindandknewthatthehighestandfirstladiesandgentlemeninEnglandhadremainedlittleornocleanerintheirtalk,andinthemoralsandconductwhichsuchtalkimplies,clearuptoonehundredyearsago;infactclearintoourownnineteenthcentury——inwhichcentury,broadlyspeaking,theearliestsamplesoftherealladyandtherealgentlemandiscoverableinEnglishhistory,——orinEuropeanhistory,forthatmatter——maybesaidtohavemadetheirappearance。SupposeSirWalter[Scott]insteadofputtingtheconversationintothemouthsofhischaracters,hadallowedthecharacterstospeakforthemselves?WeshouldhavehadtalkfromRebeccaandIvanhoeandthesoftladyRowenawhichwouldembarrassatrampinourday。However,totheunconsciouslyindelicateallthingsaredelicate。\"

    MarkTwain’sinterestinhistoryandinthedepictionofhistoricalperiodsandcharactersisrevealedthroughhisfondnessforhistoricalreadinginpreferencetofiction,andthroughhisotherhistoricalwritings。Eveninthehilarious,youthfuldaysinSanFrancisco,Painereportsthat\"Clemens,however,wasneverquitereadyforsleep。Then,asever,hewouldprophimselfupinbed,lighthispipe,andlosehimselfinEnglishorFrenchhistoryuntilhissleepconquered。\"Painetellsus,too,thatLecky’s’EuropeanMorals’wasanoldfavorite。

    Thenotesto’ThePrinceandthePauper’showagainhowcarefullyClemensexaminedhishistoricalbackground,andhisinterestinthesematerials。

    Someofthemoreimportantsourcesarenoted:Hume’s’HistoryofEngland’,Timbs’’CuriositiesofLondon’,J。HammondTrumbull’s’BlueLaws,TrueandFalse’。ApparentlyMarkTwainrelishedit,forasBernardDeVotopointsout,\"ThebookisalwaysMarkTwain。ItsparodiesofTudorspeechlapsesometimesintoacallowsatisfactioninthatidiom——Markhugelyenjoyshisnathlessesandbeshrewsandmarrys。\"Thewritingof1601foreshadowshisfondnessforthistreatment。

    \"DoyousupposethelibertiesandtheBrawnofTheseStateshavetodoonlywithdelicatelady—words?withglovedgentlemanwords\"

    WaltWhitman,’AnAmericanPrimer’。

    Although1601wasnotmatchedbyanysimilarsketchinhispublishedworks,itwasrepresentativeofMarkTwaintheman。Hewasnoemaciatedliterarytea—tosser。BronzedandweatherbeatensonoftheWest,Markwasaman’sman,andthatsignificantfactisemphasizedbytheseveralphasesofMark’srichlifeassteamboatpilot,printer,miner,andfrontierjournalist。

    OntheVirginiaCityEnterpriseMarklearnedfromeditorR。M。Daggettthat\"whenitwasnecessarytocallamannames,therewerenoexpletivestoolongortooexpressivetobehurledinrapidsuccessiontoemphasizetheutterwantofcharacterofthemanassailed……ThereweretypesetterstherewhocouldhurlanathemasatbadcopywhichwouldhavefrightenedaBengaltiger。Thenewseditorcoulddamnamutilateddispatchintwenty—fourlanguages。\"

    InSanFranciscointhesizzlingsixtieswecatchaglimpseofMarkTwainandhisbuddy,SteveGillis,pausingindoorwaystosing\"TheDolefulBalladoftheNeglectedLover,\"anoldpieceofuncollectederotica。